Hair is this emotive subject and with human nature being human nature, what we would like we can’t have and what we have we don’t want! Curly hair and we would like straight, straight hair and we would like curly, brunette and we would like blonde, blonde and we would like red. Likewise upper lip hair on women, so valued as an indication of exquisite beauty in certain parts of the entire world, is vilified by our Western society.
Unwanted hair is a common problem affecting nearly all women to varying degrees throughout their lives and prompting the utilization of various temporary types of hair reduction or hair management systems. It causes great distress, and it’s often accompanied by feelings of poor self esteem, a sense of isolation and low self worth.
Since the occasions when bearded feamales in Victorian travelling fairs were displayed for entertainment and ridicule, Western society has nurtured a stigma about excess hair. Many women are pressured into tremendous lengths to remove any trace of hair from any and every part of the body as they think it to be unattractive and unappealing. However it’s not just women that are now affected… increasingly the male gender is at the mercy of pressure from the ‘fashion’ and celebrity world and unwanted hair can be just as vilified by the male population nowadays because the female.
Different Ways of Hair Removal
Superfluous hair growth can be brought on by many factors, such as, hormone imbalance, (during puberty, pregnancy and menopause), genetics and ethnicity, hereditary, medication or topical stimulation e.g. waxing or tweezing. Therefore, electrolysis – the only permanent method of hair removal, is a treatment that’s in great demand by female and transsexual clients and now, because of society’s attitudes, the number of male clients is increasing.
To generally meet this need there as been many hair removal measures some of which go back centuries in history. Hair removal has existed since caveman times but interestingly the parts of your body we’re removing hair from have differed over the ages. Removing hair from the head and face of men was originally not for vanity purposes however for survival. There is evidence that cavemen did this but also the ancient Egyptians and it absolutely was undertaken, we imagine, for protection, as scraping off the beard and hair on the head would take away the benefit of an adversary having anything to seize onto in addition to having less mites!
In ancient Egypt, Greece, and Middle Eastern countries, removing body hair was important. In fact these women removed most of the body hair, except for eyebrows. Egyptian women removed their head hair and pubic hair was considered uncivilized by both sexes! It had been also considered uncivilized for men to have hair on their face. Undesired facial hair was the mark of a slave or servant, or of a person of lower class. The ancient Egyptians used an application of razors manufactured from flint or bronze because the razor was not invented till the 1760’s by French barber, Jean Jacques Perret.
In addition they used a technique of temporary hair removal called sugaring. A sticky paste (bees wax was sometimes used) would be applied to skin, a reel of cloth was pressed onto the wax and yanked off – very same of waxing today. Wealthy women of the Roman Empire would remove their body hair with pumice stones, razors, tweezing and pastes. There is also another technique used called threading that will be recently seeing a resurgence in popularity. Thin string or yarn would be placed through the fingers of both of your hands, and quickly stroked over the area. This repetitive process captured the hair and effectively tweezed, ripped or pulled the unwanted hair out. Through the Elizabethan times the practice of hair removal, (not of leg, armpit or pubic hair), of the eyebrows and the hair from their foreheads in order to give the looks of an extended brow and forehead was fashionable. It is startling to notice the obvious influence ‘fashion’ has played in hair removal from the very beginning.
Waxing, sugaring, depilatory creams, bleaching, shaving, sugaring, plucking, threading and even battery-powered tweezers multiple-plucking systems, are all temporary methods that lots of people try today. In fact new hair removal devices seem to seem like buses – every 20 minutes approximately! However, technology has managed to move on and with it, it seems there are some restricted and doubtful types of hair removal. X-ray and photodynamic methods come in a restricted category as the former has been banned in a few countries just like the USA and the latter are just in experimental stages. Electric tweezers, transdermal electrolysis, and microwaves are some of the doubtful methods in that there’s no established data on their effectiveness.
Electrolysis continues to be the only proven permanent method of hair removal and many women and indeed many men, have benefited using this tried and trusted treatment. It is often the case that electrologists are privileged to witness a dramatic transformation in their clients, from a shy, introverted personality at the beginning of a program of treatments, to a comfortable and happy individual once treatment is underway and results become apparent.
Whatever your opinion of hair, ‘removing it’ within our Western society is a multi million pound industry. This kind of huge money making machine though can have a lot more than its great amount of misconceptions, misunderstandings, myths and legends none of which relate much to the hard reality truth. The huge profit led hair removal industry has its great amount of charlatans and scams all attracted by the huge profit led opportunities.
Hair Removal methods are generally permanent and temporary. The English dictionary definition of ‘permanent’ states: perpetual, everlasting. With this particular in mind there is only 1 system in the marketplace today that can totally prove ‘permanent’ hair removal primarily because longevity, client testimony and satisfaction and that’s electrolysis. Invented in 1875 electrolysis offers permanent removal of hair for all hair types and colours and all skin types and colours. It continues to be utilised in hospitals by surgeons and ophthalmologists for trichaisis and other distortions of the eyelashes as well supporting a healthcare facility laser hair removal departments. It can be considered an essential tool in the task of veterinary surgeons for animals (primarily horses and dogs) for the permanent removal of distorted and in-growing eyelashes. It provides cosmetic relief for the buyer with mild hirsute problems to the individual with seriously hirsute problems and for the transgender patient who may require several hours of treatment.
Apparently there’s been confusing messages coming from the regulatory bodies on definitions of what what ‘permanent’, ‘removal’ or ‘reduction’ in the hair removal industry actually mean. Agreement was reached when the hairs which have been removed don’t grow back for a period of twelve months after the last treatment, permanent reduction can be claimed. Electrolysis, invented in 1875 remains even today, the one method legally permitted to claim ‘permanent removal’ ;.
The newer technologies such as LASER (Light Amplification Stimulated Emission of Radiation) and IPL (Intense Pulse Light) were initially launched as competitors of electrolysis and initially marketed as THE answer for all permanent hair removal. This, it’s now realised, are at best, somewhat nave and at worst, certainly misleading. The reality is that this was wishful thinking and nowadays ‘claims’ are far more realistic. The truth is that whilst they have their successes there is also their limitations – they can not treat all hair colours and types and all skin colours successfully and they now accept their limitations and embrace electrolysis and electrologists as their back up.
Laser and IPL are allowed by the FDA to claim permanent ‘reduction’ however, not permanent ‘removal’ of hair. The truth is that newer technology is brilliant for big areas and for dark hair. For grey or white hair it really simply doesn’t work. Laser and IPL target the melanin in the hair and if the hair is grey or white there is no melanin remaining in the hair for this to target. Along with this, for unknown reason(s) not most of the hair reacts to treatment and results vary from 85% – 95% success. The remaining 5% – 15% hair is likely to be stripped of its melanin (thus appearing white) but still stubbornly continues to grow. This then leaves the only option of ‘permanent hair removal’ down to additional electrolysis treatment to complete the job. Laser and IPL are now recognised to become a hair ‘management’ system and clients are advised that regrowth may occur.
Photoepilator light energy was launched in 1969 and was developed from research into laser hair removal. Photoepilators work with a burst of filtered light directed at one hair at a time. Following the focus of the light, the hair is tweezed. 激光脫毛 Like any laser and light instrument, the light utilized in the unit is targeted against the blood and melanin pigments in the hair and heats them up. To enable this technique, fibre-optic probes were inserted into the hair follicle through that the light was flashed. There is no clinical data published so far to aid any permanency claims and there is no established data on its effectiveness.
The tweezer method with its unsubstantiated claim of ‘permanent hair removal’ was first patented in 1959. This technique works by passing an electric energy through the tweezers, which holds the hair on the surface of skin by grasping them for all minutes. Electricity enters through the hair to its root and claims to permanently damage it. The scientific community has reservations because the claim of electricity destroying the main of the hair has no scientific backup.
Transcutaneous and Transdermal offers ‘permanent Hair Removal’ but no clinical data has been published currently to establish the declare that permanent hair removal is achievable using these methods. In 1985 when the utilization of AC electric tweezers was stopped, the manufacturers made some modifications in the apparatus. Adhesive patches rather than cotton swabs were introduced and a name change into transcutaneous hair removal. It uses the idea of direct current (DC) for transdermal delivery of drugs (iontophoresis) without the utilization of a needle. A DC electric energy is passed via a conductive gel on the surface of skin via an adhesive patch added to the skin. The hair root is claimed to be damaged permanently by the electric energy that travels down to the hair follicle.
Currently no clinical data can be obtained and the laws of physics don’t support the claims created by the manufacturers. Hair does not conduct electricity but skin does. As electricity passes through the medium of poor resistance, it’ll spread along the outer lining of skin rather than passing through the hair. Therefore, just like the tweezer method, the argument so it will reach the main of the hair to destroy it has no scientific backup.
Ultrasound hair removal claims that ultrasound waves are channelled precisely down the hair shaft and in the act they transform to thermal energy that super heats the hair growth areas and inhibits regrowth. It is stated that the waves are bound to the hair shaft and don’t dissipate into skin prevents any side effects.
Ultrasound hair removal offers ‘total hair removal’ and claims to function as the ‘next generation of longterm hair removal devices’ ;.It states in its marketing material that it’s ‘The hair removal solution’ and that ‘no additional hair appears in the same follicle proving that this can be a long-term treatment’ ;.The FDA hasn’t given the outcomes currently regarding a software to market in April 2010 of the most recent device.